TwitterFacebookTelegramWhatsAppEmail
Share
SHOCK REPORT: Bombshell Document Emerges Revealing President Barack Obama REQUESTED THE UNITED KINGDOM Execute PROJECT FULSOME Seeking Intelligence Gathering on The Trump Organization and Donald J. Trump for President Inc.
Ready to uncover the truth? Sick of the lies? Join our Telegram Channel now. It’s time for the real story! Stay informed! My gratitude to all my readers!
SHOCK REPORT: Obama’s Covert Directive Revealed – Project FULSOME Exposed
In a bombshell revelation, a shocking document has emerged, unearthing a clandestine operation initiated by none other than former President Barack Obama. Dubbed “Project FULSOME,” the covert mission aimed to gather intelligence on The Trump Organization and Donald J. Trump for President Inc. But what does this mean for the political landscape? Is there more to the Biden administration than meets the eye? Let’s delve into the depths of this unprecedented expose.
In the murky world of political intrigue, where whispers can sway nations and secrets hold the power to topple empires, the emergence of a document can often unleash a storm of controversy. Such is the case with the recent revelation surrounding “Project FULSOME” – a covert intelligence-gathering mission allegedly orchestrated by former President Barack Obama.
The Dark Machinations Unveiled. The veil of secrecy surrounding Project FULSOME has been ripped apart, revealing a sinister plot to scrutinize every facet of The Trump Organization and Donald J. Trump for President Inc. But what drives such clandestine actions? What depths of paranoia or power lust lead a former Commander-in-Chief to resort to such measures?
Unraveling the Threads of Deception. As Putin hinted, the ties between Obama and the current Biden administration run deep, with whispers suggesting that President Biden is merely a puppet dancing to Obama’s tune, orchestrated by the unseen hand of Emperor Xi. Could Project FULSOME be another thread in this tangled web of political manipulation? The Rice report seems to suggest so.
The Rice Report: Unveiling the Truth. In a stunning revelation, the Rice report has laid bare the extent of Obama’s machinations. The letter addressed to Boris Johnson, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, not only confirms the existence of Project FULSOME but also requests the continuation of surveillance operations even during the transition of power from Obama to Trump. Such brazen disregard for democratic norms raises alarming questions about the integrity of the highest offices of the land.
RELATED:
A Puppet Presidency? With Putin’s insinuations lingering in the air, the notion that President Biden is merely a pawn in Obama’s grand scheme gains traction. Could it be that every move made by the Biden administration is but a shadow play, orchestrated by the unseen hand of the former President? The revelations of Project FULSOME certainly lend credence to such suspicions.
The Anatomy of Deception: Project FULSOME Exposed. But what exactly does Project FULSOME entail? The sinister implications of its objectives cast a dark shadow over the political landscape. By seeking to gather intelligence on Trump-related entities, Obama’s administration appears to have crossed a line into the realm of political espionage. The very fabric of democracy is torn asunder when those entrusted with power abuse it for their own ends.
The Legacy of Obama: From Hope to Hubris. Once hailed as a beacon of hope, Obama’s legacy now stands tarnished by the revelations of Project FULSOME. The man who promised transparency and accountability now finds himself mired in a quagmire of deceit and deception. The question on everyone’s lips: How far does the rabbit hole go?
The Fallout: Political Turmoil and Public Outcry. As the shockwaves of Project FULSOME reverberate through the corridors of power, the fallout is inevitable. Calls for investigations grow louder, and the public demands answers. How deep does the rabbit hole go, and who else was complicit in Obama’s covert operations?
DEBUNKED? OR COVER-UP? UK Letter Stating President Obama Asked UK to Spy on Trump Organization and Trump Campaign
Full Text Below the Fold [Actual Signed Document]
Date: 17 November 2016 GCHQ References: A / 7238 / 6547 /12
Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs
ISA-94: APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF WARRANT CSO/142263 TO SURVEIL 725 5TH AVE. NEW YORK, NY, USA, 5TH & 26TH FLOORS
- On 28 August 2016, GCHQ/CSO filed for permission to execute Project FULSOME at the request of the US President, seeking intelligence gathering into the Trump Organization and Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., both located at 725 5th Avenue, New York, NY, USA. Activities include foreign and US domestic signals collection, in regards to communications with Russian hostile actors.
- IOCCO approved FULSOME on 15 September 2016, allowing 90 days of initial SIGINT gathering, with the potential for renewal, should the situation allow. This memo’s purpose is to request a 90 day renewal of FULSOME’s original charter, with further potential for renewal, thereafter.
- Since FULSOME’s start, a clear collection of actionable leads have accrued, both from the Trump campaign itself, from former MI5 agent Michael Steele, and from others (see fig. 1-7 in attachment).
- US National Security Adviser Rice has requested that we continue our surveillance, during the transition period, as internal US intelligence is potentially compromised by the incoming Trump administration.
- For these reasons, we are requesting that FULSOME’s charter be renewed for another 90 days.
Sincerely,
Robert Hannigan
GCHQ
*This communication is deemed Top Secret STRAP3 and must not be discussed, copied, shared, or distributed,*
ROBERT STEELE: This letter has been very effectively debunked!
WARNING: The Vatican’s Hidden Secret Revealed: ‘The Divine Prayer – A One-Minute Miracle for Patriots, All Americans, Our Heroes, and President Trump – May God Bless America!’ VIDEO BELOW
Online Lies About Spies: How a fake letter revived a claim the UK bugged Donald Trump
BUT after reviewing the obvious errors in the letter, I have concluded that it is a good try by the British to bebunk a truthful story. The mistakes are deliberate.
I know from personal and professional experience that the “Five Eyes” signals intelligence community has used one another to spy on one another’s politicians so that they can credibly say they are not doing it themselves. We now know that CIA and NSA went rogue at certain levels have been spying directly on US politicans, and also blackmailing US politicians.
All mistakes to the contrary, I judge the essence of the letter to be accurate with one big exception: GCHQ would never have asked the Prime Minister for permission, they would just have done it. Similarly the FBI was running its own wiretaps and possibly also its own audio operations in Trump Tower, on the basis of false testimony to the FISA court. Justice looms.
THE RED PILL: Discover The Secret Used By A Former CIA Scientist To Open Your ‘3rd EYE’
Hence, all of this seems to be a candidate for criminal inquiries against Obama, Rice, Clapper, Hayden, and others. It also suggests that Admiral Mike Rogers, in his visit to see then candidate Donald Trump on 17 November 2016 (note that this is the same date as the GCHQ letter), was a true patriot and blew the whistle on the criminal abuse of office by Obama and Rice and others including John Brennan and James Comey as well as those named often such as Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, and Lisa Page.
We strongly suspect the FISA investigation being completed by John Durham will lead to criminal indictments of all those names above with the possible exception of Barack Obama and of course Mke Rogers who seems to have done the right thing for the right reasons, God bless him.
A message from 4chan proposing to send a forged letter to news organizations “for the lulz,” together with the header of the fake. (Source: 4plebs)
On June 22, 2017, an anonymous user under the poster ID “yFIaEkoh” posted a forged letter to 4chan, an online forum popular with far-right and conspiracy theorist groups. The letter claimed to show that Britain’s electronic intelligence agency, GCHQ, spied during the 2016 U.S. presidential elections on the campaign of then-candidate Donald Trump at the behest of President Barack Obama.
Despite repeated exposure as a fraud, including on 4chan itself, the letter continued to circulate and was used to bolster claims that Trump remains the victim of an international “deep state” conspiracy aimed at undermining his presidency.
DFRLab tracked the forgery across the internet, as a case study in how fakes can continue to spread through willing or engaged audiences, even when their falsehood is manifest.
The letter — content
The letter, dated November 2016, purported to be a request from then-GCHQ director Robert Hannigan to UK Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson, to extend permission “to surveil” Trump’s New York headquarters, “at the request of the US President”.
The text of the letter provided some logistical details, which implicated then-National Security Advisor Susan Rice.
To judge by the image posted online, the letter had been printed out on GCHQ headed paper, signed by Hannigan, then folded twice and scanned:
However, several internal factors confirm that the letter was a forgery. Paragraph four referred to “former MI5 agent Michael Steele,” who had provided “actionable leads” on apparent “communications with Russian hostile actors.” This was a glaring error: in fact, it was a former MI6 agent, Christopher Steele, who produced a dossier on Trump’s Russian connections.
Even if the author of a “TOP SECRET” document had been so sloppy as to give the source’s name — which is unlikely — it is beyond plausibility that they would get both Steele’s first name and his affiliation wrong in a communication with their own government.
The term “to surveil” was also indicative. For one thing, the verb is typical of American English, rather than British; for another, “surveillance” is a term proper to human intelligence, not signals intelligence, which is GCHQ’s remit. This may appear a technicality, but GCHQ is a technical organization.
Even the letter’s alleged back story is evidence of falsehood. The claim that GCHQ had sought permission to “surveil” Trump’s organization “at the request of the US President” could only be genuine if we were to believe that British civil servants would accept a tasking directly from the U.S. president, bypassing not only every intelligence and diplomatic entity in the U.S., but the entire diplomatic, political, and legal system of oversight in the UK.
In the words of former GCHQ director David Ormond, explaining this to the Financial Times:
If the telephone rang in GCHQ from the White House, that in itself would be unheard of. The director would then ring his US counterpart, the director of the NSA — there’s a hotline on his desk — to ask if it was a hoax. The next person he would ring would be the foreign secretary to say we’ve had this amazing request.
Whoever forged this letter had a very romantic view of the U.S. president’s power to task, and British civil servants’ willingness to comply.
The letter — presentation
While the content was demonstrably fake, the presentation of the letter was more convincing. It used a known GCHQ logo and Hannigan’s signature, and a classification (TOP SECRET STRAP3) which belongs to a known system.
However, all three features could easily be faked with a few minutes of research. The GCHQ logo and Hannigan’s signature are both available from his resignation letter, published by GCHQ in January 2017.
The STRAP system of classification was exposed on various blogs since at least 2013, as have examples of STRAP-classified material leaked by former U.S. National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden.The forger would thus have found it easy to make their document look convincing; it is perhaps fortunate that their ability to write convincing content was so much lower.We cannot establish the identity of the forger with certainty, yet the writing bears indicative patterns. The letter was written in idiomatic English; its tone is more American than British (“surveil”, “advisor” spelt with an o), and the context of the fake suggests an American focus, but there is insufficient evidence to be conclusive.
Context
The forgery was not released into an information vacuum. Three months earlier, on March 16, 2017, Fox News commentator Andrew Napolitano, a former judge, claimed:
Sources have told me that the British foreign surveillance service, the Government Communications Headquarters, known as GCHQ, most likely provided Obama with transcripts of Trump’s calls…by bypassing all American intelligence services.
The Trump White House took up the claim, which triggered a sharp response from both GCHQ and 10 Downing Street. Napolitano was reportedly suspended from Fox for two weeks for his comments.
The forgery appears aimed at reviving and bolstering Napolitano’s story, and thus feeding the ongoing conspiracy theory that the Obama White House abused its power against Trump.
Rapid exposure
The forgery was exposed almost as soon as it was posted. According to an archive of the 4chan page, it was placed online at 20:54:49 on June 22, 2017. At 21:13:34, less than nineteen minutes later, another anonymous user replied that it was fake.
Discussion continued for over an hour. Some users initially expressed excitement and viewed it as vindication of Napolitano’s report.
In less than an hour from the original post, online users identified the aformentioned resignation letter from Robert Hannigan as a likely template.
In a manner very characteristic of 4chan users, some suggested posting and sending it to news organizations even though it was a fake to see if reporters would fall for it.
Thus, within 90 minutes of the letter’s being posted to 4chan, most users there concluded that it was a forgery.
Spreading the fake
Despite this, the forged letter kept resurfacing in various parts of the far right and among conspiracy sites. On September 24, 2017, it was posted and tweeted by a website called USfuturenews.com as if it were genuine. The post was addressed to Trump, and claimed that “the evidence of illegal political espionage against you during the campaign and after is beyond refute.”
The report failed to gain traction: the tweet was not retweeted, and it did not receive any replies.
It resurfaced on December 30, 2017, when sites in the U.S. interpreted a statement by Senator Lindsey Graham as confirming the existence of a Watergate-style conspiracy between the Obama White House, U.S. Department of Justice, and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) against Trump.
A Twitter user called @sealeney posted it with the addition of a red text box highlighting a reference to Obama’s National Security Adviser Susan Rice. This time, the tweet caught on and was retweeted 101 times. The same image, complete with red box, was posted to a website called freerepublic.com a few hours later.
Again, a user called Chillum was quick to respond and pointed out the errors. The account has since been set to private, but this screenshot provided the text.
A full week later, @Sealeney appeared to acknowledge the image was a fraud.
By that time, the tweet was widely shared, including on subreddit /r/the_donald, another highly engaged far-right and conspiracy forum, where it was upvoted almost 900 times.
Sealeney’s post appeared to have triggered aggressive narrative spread. On January 2, a Twitter user called @pepesgrandma (screen name “Babushka”) posted the letter, albeit with the caveat “if real” and with Hannigan’s name misspelt. The post was retweeted over 500 times.
The following day, the same user posted that they suspected the piece was a fake, but left the original post standing. The correction was only retweeted a dozen times.
On January 12, 2018 the pattern repeated itself. Another anonymous and hyper-partisan user, @datamanUSA, posted it with the hashtag #FusionCollusion, a reference to intelligence-gathering firm Fusion GPS, which employed Steele. The post was retweeted almost 200 times.
Again, other uses pointed out the fraud, but the post continued to spread.
A week later, the post received yet another push, this time largely driven by a user called Patricia Negron, self-styled (ironically) as a “fake news fighter”, and active on both Twitter and Facebook. This user shares a range of partisan messaging, together with posts opposing vaccination and discussing so-called “chemtrails,” a longstanding conspiracy theory which holds that the vapor trails aircraft leave are actually part of a secret plot to control the climate and/or the population.
Her original post on Facebook was shared 99 times; a follow-up post stated that the forgery was genuine and earned another 23 shares.
In a familiar pattern, another user replied that the post was a probable fake and pointed to the mistakes over Steele’s name and affiliation.
Simultaneously, Negron posted a series of tweets sharing the forgery with the hashtag Project Fulsome. Together, these tweets generated almost 1,000 retweets. Yet again, other users replied with the likelihood that the letter was a fake; yet again, the letter continued to circulate, with Negron herself defending it.
By January 30, the forged letter was shared in thousands of tweets, posted on Reddit, shared across fringe websites, and gained limited traction on Facebook. By no means was the reception uniformly uncritical; indeed, users repeatedly pointed to its errors.
Nevertheless, seven months after it was initially posted, it continued to gain traction and feed the conspiracy theory of a plot by the combined American and British “deep states” aimed at discrediting President Trump.
Conclusion
The fate of the forged GCHQ letter is a case study in how long fraudulent content can last online. Posted in June and exposed as a fake within hours, it continued to circulate through far-right and conspiracy sites and resurfaced in September, December, and into the new year.
The fact that users on these channels did expose the letter as a fake quickly demonstrated a degree of awareness in at least some parts of the online community, and a reluctance to take apparently sensational documents at face value. However, others appeared to have fallen for the forgery. Worst of all, others realized it was false but decided to share it anyway — either for entertainment or for political impact.
The letter’s continued circulation, especially by anonymous and hyper-partisan accounts, shows how vulnerable American users remain to continuous online manipulation and outright fraud.
답글 남기기
댓글을 달기 위해서는 로그인해야합니다.